Stevepamg 0 Posted May 29, 2016 Report Share Posted May 29, 2016 We really like Fred Olsen but feel their ships are in need of replacing. Do other people feel the same? Are there any plans to buy new ships? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Free 33 Posted May 30, 2016 Report Share Posted May 30, 2016 I suppose yes the ships are tired however i feel the itineraries and staff onboard more than make up for it. I have not heard of any new ships but I'm personally going on the Boudicca at the end of June! WAVES and Tumbling 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sinbad10 757 Posted May 30, 2016 Report Share Posted May 30, 2016 Thought Black Watch looked tired in 2000 when she was berthed next to Aurora in Bergen so cant imagine what she is like now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Land Ahoy 797 Posted May 30, 2016 Report Share Posted May 30, 2016 Hi I often wonder what criteria many on the forum chose a cruise. I am not bothered about the age of a ship, all I want is for the ship to be well maintained. What I expect is excellent food and service. I assume those who favour new ships wouldn't chose a brand new Travel Lodge over a stay at the elderly Dorchester. It's likely they book cruises through their eyes rather than consider the quality of the product on offer. seawitch, 2torts, HLM and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sinbad10 757 Posted May 30, 2016 Report Share Posted May 30, 2016 Hi I often wonder what criteria many on the forum chose a cruise. I am not bothered about the age of a ship, all I want is for the ship to be well maintained. What I expect is excellent food and service. I assume those who favour new ships wouldn't chose a brand new Travel Lodge over a stay at the elderly Dorchester. It's likely they book cruises through their eyes rather than consider the quality of the product on offer. I agree to a certain extent but first impressions go a long way and never been impressed by the look of Black Watch whenever we have seen her and prefer the choice of facilities that are available on newer ships which are limited on older design ships. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WAVES 125 Posted May 31, 2016 Report Share Posted May 31, 2016 I think Fred Olsen should replace one or two of there ships but stick to the smaller ships. I dont think we could handle another 6500 passanger ship! Tumbling 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Oceanview 24 Posted May 31, 2016 Report Share Posted May 31, 2016 I haven't cruised with Fred Olsen myself, but from the comments I've heard from people who have, they've said the ships are tired but they still gad a great time on board. I haven't heard any rumours about Fred Olsen getting any new ships but if they were ever to expand, I agree with Waves and that FO should stick to the smaller ships. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sammy sun 1084 Posted May 31, 2016 Report Share Posted May 31, 2016 I was actually speaking to some friends yesterday about Fred Olsen as they have just booked Boudicca to Cape Verde later this year. This will be their third cruise with Freds and they find it hard to consider going with anyone else now as they love them so much. They openly admit that the ships are small and perhaps a little tired but said it's the service that keeps them going back. For me, the look of the Fred Olsen ships has always been the stumbling block for me booking. I've commented about this multiple times on the forum in the past and I'm much better and not judging a book by it's cover but what seems to be obvious to me is that once you've taken a Fred Olsen cruise you're more likely to take another as has been the case with my friends. It's the convincing you to try them for the first time that seems to be the tricky part for them and I do think that falls solely down to the ships. One the surface they do look run down and in desperate need of refurbishment. The big question is though, if Fred Olsen built new ships, would they retain the same atmosphere and ambiance on board as the existing fleet? This is a speed bump P&O encountered with the likes of Ventura and Azura being so different to Oriana, Aurora, and Artemis etc. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Land Ahoy 797 Posted May 31, 2016 Report Share Posted May 31, 2016 I was actually speaking to some friends yesterday about Fred Olsen as they have just booked Boudicca to Cape Verde later this year. This will be their third cruise with Freds and they find it hard to consider going with anyone else now as they love them so much. They openly admit that the ships are small and perhaps a little tired but said it's the service that keeps them going back. For me, the look of the Fred Olsen ships has always been the stumbling block for me booking. I've commented about this multiple times on the forum in the past and I'm much better and not judging a book by it's cover but what seems to be obvious to me is that once you've taken a Fred Olsen cruise you're more likely to take another as has been the case with my friends. It's the convincing you to try them for the first time that seems to be the tricky part for them and I do think that falls solely down to the ships. One the surface they do look run down and in desperate need of refurbishment. The big question is though, if Fred Olsen built new ships, would they retain the same atmosphere and ambiance on board as the existing fleet? This is a speed bump P&O encountered with the likes of Ventura and Azura being so different to Oriana, Aurora, and Artemis etc. Hi Fred Olsen have the highest number of repeat number of passengers so they are obviously doing some right. It's true that the level dining and service is better than many of their competitors and appeal to those who like a more traditional cruise atmosphere and aren't interested in 24/7 entertainment. Yes the ships are elderly but they are well maintained. This is not just Fred Olsen most of the ships catering for the 6 star market are also older than P&O's fleet but I bet most on this forum would select a free vacation on one of these lines over one of the modern ships operated by other companies, sammy sun and Tumbling 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pesky Pirate 172 Posted May 31, 2016 Report Share Posted May 31, 2016 The only problem that I have noticed is that nearly always when norovirus hits the headlines it is a Fred Olsen ship. I don't for one minute think that it is due to the age of the ship rather than the clientele but if they had a ship like Artemis I would probably consider trying them out. P & O made a huge mistake getting rid of her. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Oldworldtraveller 2225 Posted May 31, 2016 Report Share Posted May 31, 2016 I travelled with Fred Olsen last month on Braemar and found everything to be in excellent condition. Certainly not tired. I often wonder what people mean when they say 'tired'. it is a well used expression that seems to mean different things to different people. Yes the ships are not the youngest at sea but they are extremely well maintained. If you look at the smaller ships being operated around the world it can be seen that there are many that are around 30 years of age. As for Norovirus it seems that whenever Fred Olsen ships get it the newspapers report it yet I haven't seen any newspaper reporting the Norovirus we had on Ovation of the Seas last week and this ship is only a few weeks old. As for new ships for Fred there was a rumour last year of a newer ship but it never happened. Bearing in mind they have maintained a repeat ratio of 65% for a number of years now it shows that they are finding new passengers to replace those that have gone so they must be doing something right. Last year this ratio on longer voyages rose to 72%. Tumbling and Popsicle 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Life0nMars 135 Posted June 1, 2016 Report Share Posted June 1, 2016 I travelled with Fred Olsen last month on Braemar and found everything to be in excellent condition. Certainly not tired. I often wonder what people mean when they say 'tired'. it is a well used expression that seems to mean different things to different people. Yes the ships are not the youngest at sea but they are extremely well maintained. If you look at the smaller ships being operated around the world it can be seen that there are many that are around 30 years of age. As for Norovirus it seems that whenever Fred Olsen ships get it the newspapers report it yet I haven't seen any newspaper reporting the Norovirus we had on Ovation of the Seas last week and this ship is only a few weeks old. As for new ships for Fred there was a rumour last year of a newer ship but it never happened. Bearing in mind they have maintained a repeat ratio of 65% for a number of years now it shows that they are finding new passengers to replace those that have gone so they must be doing something right. Last year this ratio on longer voyages rose to 72%. Certainly agree with your comments OWT. Having been on Braemar for the first time, not Fred, I would certainly return. By interest did you receive a survey commissioned by Fred Last week ? Tumbling 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
2torts 345 Posted June 1, 2016 Report Share Posted June 1, 2016 Certainly agree with your comments OWT. Having been on Braemar for the first time, not Fred, I would certainly return. By interest did you receive a survey commissioned by Fred Last week ? I did. Some interesting questions there . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Oldworldtraveller 2225 Posted June 1, 2016 Report Share Posted June 1, 2016 Certainly agree with your comments OWT. Having been on Braemar for the first time, not Fred, I would certainly return. By interest did you receive a survey commissioned by Fred Last week ? It was great to meet up with you on that cruise. Trust you are keeping well. No survey received. I wonder why Life0nMars 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tumbling 31 Posted June 2, 2016 Report Share Posted June 2, 2016 Certainly agree with your comments OWT. Having been on Braemar for the first time, not Fred, I would certainly return. By interest did you receive a survey commissioned by Fred Last week ? We are fans of Fred Olsen, although we have tried many other cruise lines. I can endorse what others have said about Fred's ships being well maintained and the food and service being excellent. As a comparison, we went on P & O's Oceana recently with some friends and found the ship to be in dire need of some maintenance. Oddly enough, her scheduled refit has been postponed from December this year by 12 months, which surprises me given her condition. Yes, we received an on line survey from Fred. It was asking what our priorities are when booking a cruise which suggested that they might be making changes or considering adding to the fleet. There has been quite a bit of discussion about it on Fred's FB page. Life0nMars 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Life0nMars 135 Posted June 2, 2016 Report Share Posted June 2, 2016 We are fans of Fred Olsen, although we have tried many other cruise lines. I can endorse what others have said about Fred's ships being well maintained and the food and service being excellent. As a comparison, we went on P & O's Oceana recently with some friends and found the ship to be in dire need of some maintenance. Oddly enough, her scheduled refit has been postponed from December this year by 12 months, which surprises me given her condition. Yes, we received an on line survey from Fred. It was asking what our priorities are when booking a cruise which suggested that they might be making changes or considering adding to the fleet. There has been quite a bit of discussion about it on Fred's FB page. Agree with you Tumbling, I had some friends on Oceana recently and they were not happy with the state of the ship. I am not a P&O fan but have travelled on a few. Best Being Britannia in my opinion. Having been on her twice now. I do wonder if she is getting special treatment with extra budget due to the advertising. I do Like Fred but not keen on Balmorals observatory lounge. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sel1230 1 Posted June 5, 2016 Report Share Posted June 5, 2016 We have sailed a few cruises including the Celebrity Silhouette but Fred Olsen cruises are outstanding for the service and quality of the cruise. We have just got back from a 9 night cruise with Fred to the Norwegian Fjords on the Boudicca. What a wonderful small ship with an excellent staff and crew, nothing is too much trouble! August 2015 we did a cruise to the Baltic with Fred on the Braemar and thoroughly enjoyed the cruise, destinations and the staff and crew who if anything were better than the Boudicca. We have three more cruises booked with Fred on different ships to the Canaries, Caribbean and Indian Ocean so I think you can say we are smitten with Fred Olsen and his small ships with the excellent maintenance and service. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
solly 0 Posted June 5, 2016 Report Share Posted June 5, 2016 Yes I do believe Fred Olsen ships need looking at. Just returned from a cruise to Canada and we could not dock at the last 2 stops because of the Ice and Snow. now probably it was too early in the Year to be sailing up the East Coast of Canada, BUT if it had been a ship not as old as the BOUDICCA we maybe could have gone and seen Red Bay, we may even have been able to sail away on time from Sydney without the threat of the wind too dangerous. Then maybe Fred Olsen should have known it did not make sense to Cruise to Canada in May. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dozydo 18 Posted June 5, 2016 Report Share Posted June 5, 2016 Easter Week on Balmoral. Nice sized cabin, large wardrobe, EIGHTEEN drawers. Just come back from 11nights on Celebrity Reflection. Medium sized balcony cabin - TWO smallish and one half-sized drawers. Suffered several nights from loud drumming from various groups in main foyer, amplified on deck 4. Never had problems sleeping during 4 voyages on Balmoral and once on Boudicca. Nuff said, Oldworldtraveller 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Squiffy on Port 7 Posted June 5, 2016 Report Share Posted June 5, 2016 Although we have read the reviews and noted the satisfaction of the cruisers, we have never sailed with either Thomson or Fred Olsen simply because the ships look so dated and unattractive. Call us superficial if you like, but we much prefer being on a ship which looks modern and inviting rather than on an aging, out-dated vessel. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Oldworldtraveller 2225 Posted June 5, 2016 Report Share Posted June 5, 2016 Hi Squiffy on Port, Could you expand on what you mean by 'outdated'. Personally I would rather travel on a product that has good food, good itineraries, pleasant staff offering good service than on one of the latest ships that may or may not offer those qualities. Having said that we all have different ideas as to what gives a good cruise experience, each to their own. Regards, Oldworldtraveller HLM 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MB alone 22 Posted June 5, 2016 Report Share Posted June 5, 2016 Thought Black Watch looked tired in 2000 when she was berthed next to Aurora in Bergen so cant imagine what she is like now. Black Watch has had a major makeover and is superb. Did five weeks on it last year, going two cruises on it this year and one on Boudicca. It looked like a proper ship against Britannia, Adventure of the Seas and another RCI. ship in Granada last November. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MB alone 22 Posted June 5, 2016 Report Share Posted June 5, 2016 Although we have read the reviews and noted the satisfaction of the cruisers, we have never sailed with either Thomson or Fred Olsen simply because the ships look so dated and unattractive. Call us superficial if you like, but we much prefer being on a ship which looks modern and inviting rather than on an aging, out-dated vessel. So you want a block of flats rather than a traditional looking ship. Fine leave the classic ships to those of us who appreciate tradition, and class PamelaD 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dicksmith 0 Posted June 6, 2016 Report Share Posted June 6, 2016 Have been on most of Fred Olsen ships. If you are a balcony fan (I won't cruise without one), then cabins tend to be pricey with less to choose from. Food is good but not as good as 10-15 years ago. Facilities are limited with only an excuse for a Casino! Certainly Black Watch has seen better days with staff fighting a constant battle to keep rust at bay. Their others are in better shape. Staff are certainly good but I've found most other lines just as good. If you are keen dancers then Fred is very good, with dance hosts on hand..........an added attraction for many. Why have I been on so many of them when I prefer the larger choice of restaurants and facilities found on more modern ships which are not that much larger and get better deals on balcony cabins? Simply because they frequently have better itineraries, able to moor up at smaller ports and frequently for longer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
wheels36 450 Posted June 7, 2016 Report Share Posted June 7, 2016 Cannot comment on all of Fred's ships but have been on Balmoral last year and this year, and did think that there was quite a bit of "touch up" painting going on around the prom deck. However, the main question is not "paint or no paint" , but "prom deck or no prom deck. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.